Claudexor

A local-first control plane that puts the coding agents you already pay for — Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, OpenCode — behind one interface with quota-aware account rotation, shared thread context, and cross-model review.

Stars
★ 518
Last updated
1d ago
License
MIT
Primary language
TypeScript

At a glance

How it runs
CLIDesktop appSelf-hosted service
Works with
Portable with changesCodex · Claude CodeOpenAI API · Claude API (Partial support)
Cost
Free software; you pay for model usage
Setup effort
Medium · a few setup steps
You'll need
Node.js >= 20.19pnpmGitat least one vendor CLI (codex, claude, cursor-agent, opencode, agy) or a provider API keymacOS for desktop app; Linux supported for CLI/daemonShell / CLINetwork accessLocal filesystemMCP Server
Typical use
A developer holding several Claude or Codex subscriptions who wants automatic switching to the account with headroom when 5-hour/7-day quota windows exhaust, instead of manual account swaps.
Not a fit if
  • Users without paid Claude/Codex/Cursor subscriptions or API keys
  • Windows users needing full support or a desktop app
  • Teams wanting a zero-learning-curve tool with no CLI relearning
Source review
76/100 · Good

What does this agent do, and when should you use it?

Claudexor (GitHub: razzant/claudexor, MIT licensed, currently v3.9.8) is a local-first control plane that runs Codex CLI, Claude Code, Cursor CLI, OpenCode, Antigravity CLI, and raw API adapters behind one typed interface. It solves problems the vendors don't ship: quota-aware rotation across multiple subscriptions (with live quota tracking and automatic account switch on typed vendor limits for Antigravity/Claude/Codex), shared thread context (read-only turns resume each vendor's native session; lane switches inject bounded continuation packets), and best-of-N races with cross-family independent reviewers and arbitration. Write turns land as inspectable patches, and every claim — cost, quota, web evidence, auth route — is a typed fact you can audit; unknown cost is never reported as $0. Everything runs on your machine, files are the source of truth, and there is no telemetry. The CLI/daemon ship via npm and the macOS desktop app ships as a signed, notarized DMG; the app is macOS-only while the CLI/daemon also run on Linux.

A managed daemon (Unix-socket command queue plus a loopback /v2 HTTP/SSE control API) drives multiple vendor coding CLIs. Core commands: claudexor ask (read-only Q&A; --deep-scan triggers a bounded multi-scout research sweep), claudexor plan (with --council drafting plans across N harnesses in parallel and merging into one unified plan), claudexor agent (write turns with --n N best-of-N races, --attempts repair loops, --until-clean, and --delegate, which injects a scoped MCP belt letting the harness spawn up to 8 isolated sub-runs), claudexor best-of, and claudexor inspect/apply/follow. At the account layer, claudexor profiles add/login/enable registers multiple named subscription bindings; unpinned runs route through a quota-aware pool picking the freshest-headroom account, while --profile pins strictly and never rotates silently. Every run writes file artifacts (events.jsonl, patch.diff, run_facts.yaml, etc.) under ~/.claudexor/v3/projects/<project-sha256>/runs/<run_id>/; apply --dry-run validates with git apply --check, and protected paths plus human approval gates are configured in versioned .claudexor/config.yaml.

  1. A developer holding several Claude or Codex subscriptions who wants automatic switching to the account with headroom when 5-hour/7-day quota windows exhaust, instead of manual account swaps.
  2. An engineering team racing the same task across Codex and Claude (best-of-N), scored by a cross-family review panel, with the winning patch auto-adopted.
  3. A tech lead needing read-only deep repo research (ask --deep-scan) or plans drafted in parallel across harnesses and merged into one (plan --council).
  4. A remote developer running threads on a Linux server over SSH while keeping the UI local on macOS.
  5. An integrator embedding Claudexor as the delegated execution layer inside another agent host (like Ouroboros) or driving it via MCP/ACP/plugins for Cursor, Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, and Copilot.
  6. A privacy-sensitive user who wants all cost and quota evidence auditable, no telemetry, and data kept entirely on-machine.

How do you install or deploy this agent?

Prerequisites: Node.js >= 20.19, pnpm (via corepack enable pnpm), Git, and at least one logged-in vendor CLI (codex, claude, cursor-agent, opencode, agy) or a provider API key. CLI: npm install -g claudexor, then run claudexor doctor. macOS desktop app: download the signed, notarized Claudexor-<version>.dmg from GitHub Releases and drag Claudexor.app into Applications — the app bundles its own daemon runtime. From source: pnpm install --frozen-lockfile && pnpm build, then run the CLI via node packages/cli/dist/cli.js. Always log in through claudexor auth login <harness>, not the bare vendor CLI.

How do you use this agent?

Start with claudexor doctor to confirm harness readiness; claudexor auth login claude (or codex/cursor) for each vendor; register a second account with claudexor profiles add claude work && claudexor profiles login claude work. Daily use: claudexor ask "2+2?" for read-only Q&A; claudexor ask --deep-scan "map this repo's auth" for research; claudexor plan "design a config-to-gates implementation" (add --council for parallel drafts); claudexor agent "fix the failing auth refresh test" --harness codex for write work; claudexor best-of "fix add()" --harness codex,claude --n 2 for races; claudexor apply <run_id> --dry-run to verify a patch before applying; bare claudexor opens a REPL thread where /harness and /profile switch lanes. Set budgets with --max-usd and web context with --web off|auto|cached|live.

What are this agent's strengths and limitations?

Pros
  • Quota-aware multi-account pool rotation is a layer vendors don't ship: live tracking of Antigravity/Claude/Codex subscription quotas with automatic rotation only on typed vendor-limit signals — never on ordinary network errors, never off an explicit pin.
  • Best-of-N races come with cross-family independent review and arbitration; a clean verified pass requires at least two distinct provider families, reducing single-model blind spots.
  • Strict typed-fact model: unknown cost is never $0 (runs can end cost_unverifiable), patches are checked with git apply --check before apply, protected paths gate on human decisions, and file artifacts are the source of truth with zero telemetry.
  • Thread continuity: read-only turns resume the vendor's native session (codex exec resume, claude --resume), and lane switches inject a bounded continuation packet disclosed per turn via a typed session.continuity event.
Limitations
  • Heavy runtime dependencies: Node.js >= 20.19, pnpm, Git, and at least one logged-in vendor CLI; the desktop app is macOS-only, Linux supports only CLI/daemon, and Windows is not fully supported (the local harness installer is typed-unsupported there in this release).
  • Live subscription-quota tracking and auto-rotation only cover harnesses with a vendor usage source (Antigravity, Claude, Codex); Cursor has none yet and is refused before start when it cannot guarantee --web off.
  • High learning and migration cost: v2 was a clean breaking reset that imports no v1 state, and many retired modes/verbs (audit, orchestrate, etc.) hard-error rather than aliasing, so the command surface must be relearned.
  • It is an orchestrator, not a substitute for subscriptions — you must hold Claude/Codex/Cursor etc. subscriptions or API keys yourself, and cross-account rotation only triggers on typed limit signals.

How does this agent compare with similar options?

Key facts side by side with the most closely related agents.

Agent Source review Form / cost Stars Updated Language Full support on
Claudexor This agent 76 · Good CLIFree + model costs ★ 518 1d ago TypeScript Codex · Claude Code
Synara 52 · Major gaps Desktop appFree + model costs ★ 2.1k 1d ago TypeScript Codex · Claude Code
Oh My OpenAgent 49 · Major gaps Agent plugin / skillFree + model costs ★ 70k today TypeScript Claude Code
multi 41 · Major gaps — ★ 23 2d ago Shell Codex · Claude Code · Claude API

How does FollowAgents rate this agent?

FollowAgents source review · FARS-2.1
Good
76/ 100 5-point scale 3.8 / 5
This review covers the source as of Sep 09, 2026. The project has shipped 24 stable release(s) since, which have not been re-reviewed. The score and verdict describe the reviewed version only. Recent releases ↓
Trust 22/29
Reliability 11/14
Adaptability 14/18
Convention 15/18
Effectiveness 10/13
Verifiability 4/8
Why each dimension lost points
Trust22 / 29 · 3.8/5

Least privilege: scoped HOME, MCP belt with no apply tool, and nesting caps are documented, but SECURITY.md admits trusted `full` can reach out-of-project paths with no OS sandbox boundary — deduct 1. User confirmation: protected-path human gates, apply --dry-run, disclosed-and-confirmed install recipes, one-way worktree isolation earn 3. Data flow transparency: typed continuity events, loopback-only API, no-telemetry posture, and itemized outbound traffic earn 3. Sensitive data: 0600 store and redaction claims are specific but asserted without implementation code in evidence — deduct 1. Dependency security: SHA-pinned CI actions, frozen lockfile, exact npm pins, recorded installer SHA-256; no dependency vulnerability scanning visible — deduct 1. External effects: out-of-patch-capture effects of `full` are disclosed, not contained — deduct 1. Rollback: fail-closed signed-manifest updates with automatic last-known-good rollback and timestamped SSH-config backups earn 3. Source attribution: prior art credited (Praxis Relay, CLIProxyAPI), but publisher is unverified and maintainer is an individual — 1.

Reliability11 / 14 · 3.9/5

Self-consistency: mode/flag/retired-ID contracts align across README, SECURITY.md, and CI gates (docs-truth-check), but many README assertions cannot be cross-checked within the provided files — deduct 1. Dependency availability: doctor reports harness availability, engines pinned, multi-Node/multi-OS CI matrix — 2 (third-party CLI behavior not statically provable). Failure messages: unknown flags and retired modes hard-error with exit 2, doctor -- must be honest or CI fails, typed-failure contracts throughout — 3.

Adaptability14 / 18 · 3.9/5

Audience: clearly targets multi-subscription power users and embedding hosts (Ouroboros), but primarily expert users — deduct 1. Capability boundaries: Cursor quota gap, Windows typed-unsupported installer, explicit in/out-of-scope earn 3. Trigger precision: strict mode-ID validation, retired IDs hard-error, flag coupling rules — 2 (contracts precise but high complexity enlarges misuse surface). Environment fit: macOS/Linux/Windows CI, SSH remote, npm and source paths documented, though remote/embedded claims carry many conditional caveats — deduct 1.

Convention15 / 18 · 4.2/5

Information architecture: well-structured README TOC, dedicated SECURITY.md, referenced docs — 3. Install notes: npm/DMG/source routes with prerequisites and legacy-DMG handling — 3. Naming stability: retired verbs hard-error rather than alias, but heavy renames across v3 — deduct 1. Examples/FAQ: rich quickstart and concrete panel-JSON examples, no FAQ, examples unverified by execution — deduct 1. Known limitations: Cursor quota absence, `full` boundary, release exceptions candidly listed — 3. License: MIT, consistent across LICENSE and package. — 3. Versioning/changelog: v3.10.1, changesets, elaborate update mechanism, but no CHANGELOG file in evidence — deduct 1. Maintenance: SECURITY.md gives response expectations and support policy, but individual maintainer with no stated sustainability — deduct 1.

Effectiveness10 / 13 · 3.8/5

Output usability: typed receipts, dry-run, inspect/follow, file-backed artifacts — well specified but not executable-verified — deduct 1. Marginal value: quota rotation, best-of-N cross-family review, honest budget accounting (unknown cost is never $0) are concrete increments vendors don't ship — 3. Cost benefit: shared budget authority and exact pins reduce waste, but high product complexity imposes real learning/operational cost — deduct 1.

Verifiability4 / 8 · 2.5/5

Claim traceability: INV numbering, docs-truth-check, INV→verify gates show a traceability apparatus — 2 (present in files but not item-verifiable here). Cross-source corroboration: README, SECURITY.md, and CI mutually support secret scanning, no-telemetry, rollback, but download badges, tests, and audits cannot be independently confirmed from static files and no third-party verification exists — deduct 2. Fact/inference separation: unknown-cost honesty, explicitly-unverified inputs, typed failure disclosure are good conventions — deduct 1 because execution claims (E2E, canary) cannot be separated from assertion at this review depth.

Risks and how to mitigate them
  • Publisher is unverified: installing grants the tool power to drive paid vendor credentials and mutate repositories — review install and login paths in an isolated environment first.
  • Processes under trusted `full` can read/write outside the project, and those effects are outside patch capture/review/rollback custody — avoid `full` on high-value repos.
  • Sensitive-data protections (0600 store, log redaction) are documentation claims not verified by this static review.
  • No evidence of dependency vulnerability scanning; run npm/pnpm audit yourself and keep the lockfile current.
  • Cursor has no quota source, so rotation and budget accounting may be inaccurate on the Cursor path.
  • Updates rely on a signed manifest with an offline key; v3.8.0/v3.9.0/v3.9.7 are signature-waived releases with restricted upgrade paths — note this before adopting.
Evidence confidence: Low Reviewed Sep 09, 2026 Reviewed revision e9b758d84018 New commits since this review; the score may not cover them
See the full review method →

Recent releases

Latest entries from the project's GitHub Releases. Notes are quoted from upstream as written, not rewritten or tested by FollowAgents.

  1. v4.7.0 Claudexor 4.7.0
    Release notes excerpt
    Claudexor 4.7.0 (2026-10-22): Native workspace-write runs can use exact caller-created external download-cache and verification-scratch directories through execution.auxiliaryWritableRoots (CLI --auxiliary-writable-root). The negotiated accessControl.auxiliaryWritableRoots capability currently identifies Codex support; unsupported explicit selections refuse, while Auto filters incompatible lanes before profile checks. Admission rejects overlap with source/execution trees and protected engine/profile state, including macOS directory aliases. Grants apply per native turn without changing …
    View on GitHub ↗
  2. v4.6.2 Claudexor 4.6.2
    Release notes excerpt
    Claudexor 4.6.2 (2026-10-22): The first published release of the 4.6 line on GitHub. v4.6.1 reached npm, but #485 reached main while its publish ran, so its GitHub Release was refused; everything listed under v4.6.1 and v4.6.0 ships here. Also new: local macOS app bundles are ad-hoc signed and strictly verified before a ZIP or DMG is made (#485). Thanks to @IlidanNaga for #485. Signed, notarized, stapled, SBOM-backed and provenance-attested.
    View on GitHub ↗
  3. v4.5.0 Claudexor 4.5.0
    Release notes excerpt
    Claudexor 4.5.0 (2026-10-21): An account that cannot serve a requested Codex model no longer absorbs every request for that model. Auto model operations prefer accounts whose live catalog lists the model. A recognized pre-generation refusal (model_capability_refused: an explicit model-not-found or not-supported code, the ChatGPT-account unsupported-model sentence, the narrow missing-model sentences) gives that account a temporary capability mark for that model (four hours, then one probe; cleared by service there or by a catalog or credential change). Any other definite provider HTTP 4xx be …
    View on GitHub ↗
View on GitHub ↗ Install ↓

Compare agents like this one

The same FARS review applied across the shortlist this agent qualifies for.

Related agents