Dev & Engineering codex-clicursor-agentopencodemcpquota-rotationmulti-accountcode-reviewclilocal-first

Claudexor

A local-first control plane that puts the coding agents you already pay for — Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, OpenCode — behind one interface with quota-aware account rotation, shared thread context, and cross-model review.

FollowAgents review · FARS-2.1
Recommended
76/ 100 5-point scale 3.8 / 5
1 2 3 4 5 6
1Trust22 / 29 · 3.8/5

Least privilege: scoped HOME, MCP belt with no apply tool, and nesting caps are documented, but SECURITY.md admits trusted `full` can reach out-of-project paths with no OS sandbox boundary — deduct 1. User confirmation: protected-path human gates, apply --dry-run, disclosed-and-confirmed install recipes, one-way worktree isolation earn 3. Data flow transparency: typed continuity events, loopback-only API, no-telemetry posture, and itemized outbound traffic earn 3. Sensitive data: 0600 store and redaction claims are specific but asserted without implementation code in evidence — deduct 1. Dependency security: SHA-pinned CI actions, frozen lockfile, exact npm pins, recorded installer SHA-256; no dependency vulnerability scanning visible — deduct 1. External effects: out-of-patch-capture effects of `full` are disclosed, not contained — deduct 1. Rollback: fail-closed signed-manifest updates with automatic last-known-good rollback and timestamped SSH-config backups earn 3. Source attribution: prior art credited (Praxis Relay, CLIProxyAPI), but publisher is unverified and maintainer is an individual — 1.

2Reliability11 / 14 · 3.9/5

Self-consistency: mode/flag/retired-ID contracts align across README, SECURITY.md, and CI gates (docs-truth-check), but many README assertions cannot be cross-checked within the provided files — deduct 1. Dependency availability: doctor reports harness availability, engines pinned, multi-Node/multi-OS CI matrix — 2 (third-party CLI behavior not statically provable). Failure messages: unknown flags and retired modes hard-error with exit 2, doctor -- must be honest or CI fails, typed-failure contracts throughout — 3.

3Adaptability14 / 18 · 3.9/5

Audience: clearly targets multi-subscription power users and embedding hosts (Ouroboros), but primarily expert users — deduct 1. Capability boundaries: Cursor quota gap, Windows typed-unsupported installer, explicit in/out-of-scope earn 3. Trigger precision: strict mode-ID validation, retired IDs hard-error, flag coupling rules — 2 (contracts precise but high complexity enlarges misuse surface). Environment fit: macOS/Linux/Windows CI, SSH remote, npm and source paths documented, though remote/embedded claims carry many conditional caveats — deduct 1.

4Convention15 / 18 · 4.2/5

Information architecture: well-structured README TOC, dedicated SECURITY.md, referenced docs — 3. Install notes: npm/DMG/source routes with prerequisites and legacy-DMG handling — 3. Naming stability: retired verbs hard-error rather than alias, but heavy renames across v3 — deduct 1. Examples/FAQ: rich quickstart and concrete panel-JSON examples, no FAQ, examples unverified by execution — deduct 1. Known limitations: Cursor quota absence, `full` boundary, release exceptions candidly listed — 3. License: MIT, consistent across LICENSE and package. — 3. Versioning/changelog: v3.10.1, changesets, elaborate update mechanism, but no CHANGELOG file in evidence — deduct 1. Maintenance: SECURITY.md gives response expectations and support policy, but individual maintainer with no stated sustainability — deduct 1.

5Effectiveness10 / 13 · 3.8/5

Output usability: typed receipts, dry-run, inspect/follow, file-backed artifacts — well specified but not executable-verified — deduct 1. Marginal value: quota rotation, best-of-N cross-family review, honest budget accounting (unknown cost is never $0) are concrete increments vendors don't ship — 3. Cost benefit: shared budget authority and exact pins reduce waste, but high product complexity imposes real learning/operational cost — deduct 1.

6Verifiability4 / 8 · 2.5/5

Claim traceability: INV numbering, docs-truth-check, INV→verify gates show a traceability apparatus — 2 (present in files but not item-verifiable here). Cross-source corroboration: README, SECURITY.md, and CI mutually support secret scanning, no-telemetry, rollback, but download badges, tests, and audits cannot be independently confirmed from static files and no third-party verification exists — deduct 2. Fact/inference separation: unknown-cost honesty, explicitly-unverified inputs, typed failure disclosure are good conventions — deduct 1 because execution claims (E2E, canary) cannot be separated from assertion at this review depth.

Evidence confidence: Low Reviewed Sep 09, 2026 Reviewed revision e9b758d84018
Before you use it
  • Publisher is unverified: installing grants the tool power to drive paid vendor credentials and mutate repositories — review install and login paths in an isolated environment first.
  • Processes under trusted `full` can read/write outside the project, and those effects are outside patch capture/review/rollback custody — avoid `full` on high-value repos.
  • Sensitive-data protections (0600 store, log redaction) are documentation claims not verified by this static review.
  • No evidence of dependency vulnerability scanning; run npm/pnpm audit yourself and keep the lockfile current.
  • Cursor has no quota source, so rotation and budget accounting may be inaccurate on the Cursor path.
  • Updates rely on a signed manifest with an offline key; v3.8.0/v3.9.0/v3.9.7 are signature-waived releases with restricted upgrade paths — note this before adopting.
Review evidence [1][2][3][4][5][6]
See the full review method →

What does this agent do, and when should you use it?

Claudexor (GitHub: razzant/claudexor, MIT licensed, currently v3.9.8) is a local-first control plane that runs Codex CLI, Claude Code, Cursor CLI, OpenCode, Antigravity CLI, and raw API adapters behind one typed interface. It solves problems the vendors don't ship: quota-aware rotation across multiple subscriptions (with live quota tracking and automatic account switch on typed vendor limits for Antigravity/Claude/Codex), shared thread context (read-only turns resume each vendor's native session; lane switches inject bounded continuation packets), and best-of-N races with cross-family independent reviewers and arbitration. Write turns land as inspectable patches, and every claim — cost, quota, web evidence, auth route — is a typed fact you can audit; unknown cost is never reported as $0. Everything runs on your machine, files are the source of truth, and there is no telemetry. The CLI/daemon ship via npm and the macOS desktop app ships as a signed, notarized DMG; the app is macOS-only while the CLI/daemon also run on Linux.

A managed daemon (Unix-socket command queue plus a loopback /v2 HTTP/SSE control API) drives multiple vendor coding CLIs. Core commands: claudexor ask (read-only Q&A; --deep-scan triggers a bounded multi-scout research sweep), claudexor plan (with --council drafting plans across N harnesses in parallel and merging into one unified plan), claudexor agent (write turns with --n N best-of-N races, --attempts repair loops, --until-clean, and --delegate, which injects a scoped MCP belt letting the harness spawn up to 8 isolated sub-runs), claudexor best-of, and claudexor inspect/apply/follow. At the account layer, claudexor profiles add/login/enable registers multiple named subscription bindings; unpinned runs route through a quota-aware pool picking the freshest-headroom account, while --profile pins strictly and never rotates silently. Every run writes file artifacts (events.l, patch.diff, run_facts.yaml, etc.) under ~/.claudexor/v3/projects/<project-sha256>/runs/<run_id>/; apply --dry-run validates with git apply --check, and protected paths plus human approval gates are configured in versioned .claudexor/config.yaml.

  1. A developer holding several Claude or Codex subscriptions who wants automatic switching to the account with headroom when 5-hour/7-day quota windows exhaust, instead of manual account swaps.
  2. An engineering team racing the same task across Codex and Claude (best-of-N), scored by a cross-family review panel, with the winning patch auto-adopted.
  3. A tech lead needing read-only deep repo research (ask --deep-scan) or plans drafted in parallel across harnesses and merged into one (plan --council).
  4. A remote developer running threads on a Linux server over SSH while keeping the UI local on macOS.
  5. An integrator embedding Claudexor as the delegated execution layer inside another agent host (like Ouroboros) or driving it via MCP/ACP/plugins for Cursor, Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, and Copilot.
  6. A privacy-sensitive user who wants all cost and quota evidence auditable, no telemetry, and data kept entirely on-machine.

What are this agent's strengths and limitations?

Pros
  • Quota-aware multi-account pool rotation is a layer vendors don't ship: live tracking of Antigravity/Claude/Codex subscription quotas with automatic rotation only on typed vendor-limit signals — never on ordinary network errors, never off an explicit pin.
  • Best-of-N races come with cross-family independent review and arbitration; a clean verified pass requires at least two distinct provider families, reducing single-model blind spots.
  • Strict typed-fact model: unknown cost is never $0 (runs can end cost_unverifiable), patches are checked with git apply --check before apply, protected paths gate on human decisions, and file artifacts are the source of truth with zero telemetry.
  • Thread continuity: read-only turns resume the vendor's native session (codex exec resume, claude --resume), and lane switches inject a bounded continuation packet disclosed per turn via a typed session.continuity event.
Limitations
  • Heavy runtime dependencies: Node.js >= 20.19, pnpm, Git, and at least one logged-in vendor CLI; the desktop app is macOS-only, Linux supports only CLI/daemon, and Windows is not fully supported (the local harness installer is typed-unsupported there in this release).
  • Live subscription-quota tracking and auto-rotation only cover harnesses with a vendor usage source (Antigravity, Claude, Codex); Cursor has none yet and is refused before start when it cannot guarantee --web off.
  • High learning and migration cost: v2 was a clean breaking reset that imports no v1 state, and many retired modes/verbs (audit, orchestrate, etc.) hard-error rather than aliasing, so the command surface must be relearned.
  • It is an orchestrator, not a substitute for subscriptions — you must hold Claude/Codex/Cursor etc. subscriptions or API keys yourself, and cross-account rotation only triggers on typed limit signals.

How do you install or deploy this agent?

Prerequisites: Node.js >= 20.19, pnpm (via corepack enable pnpm), Git, and at least one logged-in vendor CLI (codex, claude, cursor-agent, opencode, agy) or a provider API key. CLI: npm install -g claudexor, then run claudexor doctor. macOS desktop app: download the signed, notarized Claudexor-<version>.dmg from GitHub Releases and drag Claudexor.app into Applications — the app bundles its own daemon runtime. From source: pnpm install --frozen-lockfile && pnpm build, then run the CLI via node packages/cli/dist/cli.js. Always log in through claudexor auth login <harness>, not the bare vendor CLI.

How do you use this agent?

Start with claudexor doctor to confirm harness readiness; claudexor auth login claude (or codex/cursor) for each vendor; register a second account with claudexor profiles add claude work && claudexor profiles login claude work. Daily use: claudexor ask "2+2?" for read-only Q&A; claudexor ask --deep-scan "map this repo's auth" for research; claudexor plan "design a config-to-gates implementation" (add --council for parallel drafts); claudexor agent "fix the failing auth refresh test" --harness codex for write work; claudexor best-of "fix add()" --harness codex,claude --n 2 for races; claudexor apply <run_id> --dry-run to verify a patch before applying; bare claudexor opens a REPL thread where /harness and /profile switch lanes. Set budgets with --max-usd and web context with --web off|auto|cached|live.

Compare agents like this one

The same FARS review applied across the shortlist this agent qualifies for.

Related agents