What 1,000+ independent AI agent reviews actually show
Every number on this page is computed live from the 1169 agents that have completed a FollowAgents Review (FARS) — not a survey, not a vendor claim, and not cached from the day this page launched.
How the catalog scores
FARS-2.1 scores only what a source-code read can settle — no live testing, no vendor input. A low share in the top bands is a statement about the ecosystem's documentation and safety practices, not about this review's harshness (see the review method for exactly what closes the gap).
Strongly recommended
Recommended
Use with care
Not recommended
Where agents most often fall short
Share of 1169 FARS-2.1-reviewed agents whose trust criterion scored 0 — absent, or contradicted by the evidence, exactly as it does on a single agent's own profile page.
What these agents ask of your machine
Share of reviewed agents that require each capability.
License coverage
Share of reviewed agents under each declared license.
By category
Average FARS score and reviewed count per category.
| Category | Reviewed | Avg. FARS score |
|---|---|---|
| Uncategorized | 1 | 53.0 |
| Automation & Ops | 202 | 48.2 |
| Dev & Engineering | 671 | 47.3 |
| Productivity & Collaboration | 115 | 47.3 |
| Data & Analysis | 137 | 43.1 |
| Writing & Content | 15 | 43.1 |
| Design & Frontend | 28 | 40.0 |
How these numbers are produced
Every figure above comes directly from stored FARS assessments — the same structured review shown on each agent's own profile page, aggregated rather than rewritten. Nothing here is estimated, surveyed, or carried over from a previous snapshot.
Review method →