Dev & Engineering coding-agent-hookspolicy-enginegit-safetysecret-sanitizationlocal-dashboardnpm-cli

Failproof AI

A local policy layer that intercepts risky coding-agent actions before they become incidents.

FollowAgents review · FARS-2.1
Not recommended
40/ 100 5-point scale 2.0 / 5
1 2 3 4 5 6
Per-dimension scores and reasoning
1Trust10 / 29 · 1.7/5

Evidence shows policy mechanisms (deny/allow) and local running, but least privilege is not explicit; user confirmation only mentioned for first-run prompt, not all dangerous operations; data flow transparency has local logs and dashboard but no data flow details; sensitive data handling has sanitize-api-keys policy but no storage/encryption details; dependency security has OSV-Scanner and Socket but no scan results; external effects include blocking dangerous git operations but no network access details; rollback mechanism not mentioned; source attribution has author info but publisher unverified.

2Reliability5 / 14 · 1.8/5

Self-consistency: README claims zero latency but no performance data; dependency availability: CI and build processes exist but no availability guarantees; failure messages: deny messages returned to agent but no error handling details.

3Adaptability8 / 18 · 2.2/5

Audience and scenarios: targets developers and multiple agent CLIs, scenarios clear; capability boundaries: 30 built-in policies but no limits on custom policies; trigger precision: event matching exists but no false positive rate; environment fit: supports multiple CLIs and local running but no system requirements.

4Convention8 / 18 · 2.2/5

Information architecture: docs links and table of contents, clear structure; install notes: npm install command but no detailed steps; naming stability: beta version may be unstable; examples and FAQ: custom policy example but no FAQ; known limitations: not explicitly listed; license: MIT+Commons Clause but metadata NOASSERTION; versioning and changelog: version number but no changelog; maintenance responsibility: authors and contact but no maintenance plan.

5Effectiveness6 / 13 · 2.3/5

Output usability: dashboard and logs but no output format; marginal value: failure prevention feature, unique value; cost benefit: local running but no performance data.

6Verifiability3 / 8 · 1.9/5

Claim traceability: README has docs links but no specific evidence; cross-source corroboration: CI and scanning exist but no results; fact-inference separation: not explicitly distinguished.

Evidence confidence: Low Reviewed Aug 09, 2026 Reviewed revision 822022f758d5
The upstream repository has new commits since this review. The score still applies to the reviewed revision shown and may not cover the latest changes.
Safety controls not found in source: rollback or recovery path
Before you use it
  • Publisher unverified, identity unknown.
  • License metadata NOASSERTION, actual MIT+Commons Clause, confirm compliance.
  • Beta version may be unstable.
  • No rollback mechanism provided.
  • No performance data, zero latency claim unverified.
Review evidence [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]
See the full review method →

What does this agent do, and when should you use it?

Failproof AI is a local runtime policy tool for coding-agent CLIs that operates through hooks around agent tool calls. The repository explicitly lists support for Claude Code, OpenAI Codex, GitHub Copilot CLI, Cursor Agent CLI, OpenCode, Pi, and other named CLIs. Its installation flow activates 30 built-in policies and exposes a local dashboard at localhost:8020. Documented protections include direct pushes to main/master, force pushes, commits or history operations on the primary branch, recursive deletion, and API-key exposure in agent context. Teams can add JavaScript policies under `.failproofai/policies/` and commit them for teammates to load after pulling.

After failproofai runs, it hooks into supported agent CLIs and evaluates their tool calls. Built-in policies inspect actions such as git push --force, direct pushes to main/master, commits/merges/rebases on main/master, recursive file deletion, and API keys entering agent context; policies return allow(), deny(message), or instruct(message). Custom JavaScript policies are registered with customPolicies.add(), can match events such as PreToolUse, and can inspect tool input through ctx.toolInput, including file_path. Each agent tool call is logged locally, and the dashboard shows what ran, what was blocked, and the policy message returned to the agent.

  1. A developer using Claude Code or Codex on a production repository who wants direct pushes to main/master stopped before execution.
  2. An engineering team that permits agent-driven Git workflows but needs to block git push --force and primary-branch commits, merges, or rebases.
  3. A maintainer assigning cleanup work to a coding agent who wants recursive deletion intercepted by policy.
  4. A security-conscious team that wants sanitize-api-keys to prevent API keys from leaking into agent context.
  5. A repository owner who wants to block writes to production paths with a committed no-production-writes policy.

What are this agent's strengths and limitations?

Pros
  • Applies policy at the agent tool-call boundary, allowing it to block risky Git actions and recursive deletion before they execute.
  • Ships with 30 built-in policies, with explicitly documented coverage for primary-branch safety, force pushes, and API-key context exposure.
  • Supports repository-level JavaScript policies that autoload from .failproofai/policies/.
  • Keeps a local tool-call record and provides a localhost dashboard for executions, blocks, and policy feedback.
Limitations
  • The documented integrations are named agent CLIs; the supplied material does not describe a generic protocol or integration path for arbitrary agent runtimes.
  • Adoption requires shell usage, npm, and local filesystem access rather than a hosted service workflow.
  • Commercial resale of Failproof AI itself requires a separate agreement under its MIT plus Commons Clause licensing.
  • The supplied material links to, but does not detail, the full built-in-policy behavior, false-positive handling, or performance measurements.

How do you install or deploy this agent?

No credentials are documented. Install globally with npm and install the policies:

npm install -g failproofai
failproofai policies --install

Then start it:

failproofai

The first run presents a prompt; set FAILPROOFAI_NO_FIRST_RUN=1 to disable it.

How do you use this agent?

Run failproofai after installation; the README states that 30 built-in policies activate immediately. Open localhost:8020 to inspect local session and policy activity. For repository-specific controls, add a JavaScript file under .failproofai/policies/ and register it with customPolicies.add({ name, match: { events: ["PreToolUse"] }, fn }); have fn return allow(), deny(message), or instruct(message). Commit the policy so teammates can load it on their next pull.

How does this agent compare with similar options?

Failproof AI is not presented as a replacement for Claude Code or Codex; it adds a hook-based runtime policy layer to those coding agents and other listed CLIs, including GitHub Copilot CLI, Cursor Agent CLI, OpenCode, Pi, Hermes, OpenClaw, Factory Droid, Devin CLI, Antigravity CLI, and Goose.

FAQ

Does it replace my coding agent?
No. It hooks into supported agent CLIs and applies policies to the agents' tool calls.
What decisions can a policy make?
allow() permits the operation, deny(message) blocks it and sends a message back to the agent, and instruct(message) permits it while adding context to the agent's next prompt.
Are logs required to leave my machine?
The supplied material says every tool call is logged locally and the dashboard runs at localhost:8020; it does not state that log upload is required.
How can a team share custom controls?
Place policy files in .failproofai/policies/ and commit them. The README states that teammates receive them on their next pull.
Are there licensing limits?
The repository describes free internal and personal use, while commercial resale of Failproof AI itself requires a separate agreement.

Compare agents like this one

The same FARS review applied across the shortlist this agent qualifies for.

Related agents