Firecrawl: Web Data API
Convert websites into clean Markdown or structured data for AI agents to access real-time web information.
- Source repo
- firecrawl/firecrawl
- Stars
- ★ 193k
- Last updated
- today
- License
- AGPL-3.0
- Primary language
- TypeScript
- FA score
- 41/100 · Major gaps
At a glance
- How it runs
- Works with
- Universal · cross-platformChatGPT · Claude Code
- Cost
- Free tier plus a paid hosted plan
- Setup effort
- Low · running in minutes
- You'll need
- Typical use
- Data scientists needing structured data from multiple websites for research.
- Not a fit if
- Teams that need fully offline, on-premise data handling
- Users unwilling to sign up for a firecrawl.dev API key
- Teams that want to run and maintain their own scraping infrastructure
- Source review
- 41/100 · Major gaps 3 safety controls not found
What does this agent do, and when should you use it?
Firecrawl is an open-source API for search, scraping, crawling, and interacting with the web. It supports converting URLs to clean Markdown, structured JSON, or screenshots, with the ability to handle JavaScript-heavy pages. Core endpoints include /search, /scrape, /interact, /crawl, /map, and /agent, with SDKs for Python, Node.js, Go, Java, and more. Firecrawl offers a hosted service (firecrawl.dev) and self-hosting options, and provides MCP servers and CLI skills for AI agents.
Firecrawl provides multiple API endpoints: /search performs web searches and returns page content; /scrape converts any URL to Markdown, HTML, screenshots, or structured JSON; /interact allows AI-prompts or code actions on pages; /crawl scrapes entire websites; /map discovers all URLs on a website; /agent uses an AI agent to autonomously gather data based on prompts. Output formats include Markdown, structured JSON, screenshots, and live views. It supports media parsing (PDF, DOCX), actions (click, scroll, type, etc.), and integrates into AI agents via MCP and CLI skills.
- Data scientists needing structured data from multiple websites for research.
- AI application developers needing clean Markdown for LLM consumption.
- Business analysts monitoring competitor pricing using the /agent endpoint.
- Developers integrating web search into chatbots like Claude Code.
- Researchers extracting content from PDFs, DOCX, and other media formats.
- Users needing batch scraping of multiple URLs via /batch_scrape.
How do you install or deploy this agent?
Sign up at firecrawl.dev for an API key. Python: pip install firecrawl-py. Node.js: npm install firecrawl. CLI available via npx.
How do you use this agent?
Initialize the client with your API key: Python Firecrawl(api_key="fc-..."), Node.js new Firecrawl({apiKey: "fc-..."}). Use /search for web search, /scrape for URL scraping, /agent for intelligent data gathering. CLI: firecrawl search "query" --limit 5, firecrawl scrape <url>.
What are this agent's strengths and limitations?
- High coverage, handles JS-heavy pages without extra proxy configuration.
- Outputs LLM-friendly Markdown or structured JSON, saving tokens.
- MCP and CLI skills for easy integration with popular AI agents.
- Supports interactive actions (click, scroll, etc.) for dynamic pages.
- Self-hosting option for greater data control.
- Requires API key; free tier limited, paid for high usage.
- Self-hosting is complex and requires managing infrastructure.
- Dependency on external service (hosted version) raises data privacy concerns.
How does this agent compare with similar options?
Compared to Apify and ScrapingBee, Firecrawl offers simpler AI-driven data collection via /agent endpoint, but all are commercial services.
Key facts side by side with the most closely related agents.
| Agent | Source review | Form / cost | Stars | Updated | Language | Full support on |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Firecrawl: Web Data API This agent | 41 · Major gaps | Library / SDKFreemium | ★ 193k | today | TypeScript | ChatGPT · Claude Code |
| Maxun | 48 · Major gaps | Hosted serviceFreemium | ★ 18k | today | TypeScript | — |
| Apify MCP Server | 77 · Some gaps | Hosted serviceFree + model costs | ★ 12k | 2d ago | TypeScript | ChatGPT · Claude Code · Claude.ai |
| webclaw Web Extraction Engine | 66 · Some gaps | CLIFreemium | ★ 2.4k | 26d ago | Rust | Codex · Claude Code · OpenAI API · Claude API |
How does FollowAgents rate this agent?
Why each dimension lost points
Evidence shows: API keys are passed via environment variables or parameters, tests verify cloud requires API key and self-host allows missing, indicating partial least privilege. But user confirmation is absent, data flow transparency is limited, sensitive data handling is not detailed, dependency security is not mentioned, external effects (like scraping behavior) have basic description but no detailed control, rollback is not mentioned, source attribution has contributor list but no clear maintenance responsibility. Deductions: user confirmation missing, data flow opaque, dependency security not assessed, rollback missing.
Evidence shows: README and SDK docs are consistent, tests cover main features, but dependency availability is not explicit, failure messages are not detailed. Deductions: dependency availability not verified, failure messages insufficient.
Evidence shows: targeted at AI agents and developers, scenarios are diverse, capability boundaries are described (e.g., respects robots.txt), but trigger precision (like interaction) relies on AI prompts, environment fit has multiple SDKs. Deductions: trigger precision relies on external AI, environment fit not fully covered.
Evidence shows: information architecture is clear, install notes are detailed, naming is stable, examples are abundant, known limitations are mentioned, license is clear, but version changelog is not provided, maintenance responsibility is not clear. Deductions: version changelog missing, maintenance responsibility unclear.
Evidence shows: output formats are diverse (markdown, JSON, etc.), marginal value is high, but cost-benefit is not detailed. Deductions: cost-benefit not quantified.
Evidence shows: claims in README have some links for support, but cross-source verification is insufficient, facts and inferences are not clearly separated. Deductions: cross-source verification insufficient, facts and inferences not separated.
- Not found in source: confirmation before actingTurn on (or add) a confirmation step before it acts, and try it in a sandbox or test environment before real data.
- Not found in source: dependency securityPin versions and run a dependency audit (npm audit, pip-audit) before installing; prefer running it in a container.
- Not found in source: rollback or recovery pathBack up first, or work on a git branch or snapshot, so its changes can be undone.
- Handle API keys carefully to avoid leakage in logs.
- Scraping may violate website policies; respect robots.txt and privacy policies.
- Dependency security not assessed; check for vulnerabilities.
- Version changelog missing; be cautious before upgrading.
Recent releases
Latest entries from the project's GitHub Releases. Notes are quoted from upstream as written, not rewritten or tested by FollowAgents.
-
v2.11.0 Firecrawl v2.11.0
Release notes excerpt
Firecrawl v2.11.0 Improvements - Firecrawl Research Index — Added a specialized index for agentic AI/ML research: search across 3M+ arXiv papers and the GitHub code behind them (issues, merged PRs, and READMEs, refreshed daily), fetch a paper's details or related work, and check claims against full text. It has state-of-the-art recall on arXivQA, outperforming the next best provider by 18% at comparable cost. Available via the API, SDKs, MCP, and CLI. …View on GitHub ↗ -
v2.10 Firecrawl v2.10
Release notes excerpt
Firecrawl v2.10 Improvements - /parse endpoint — Upload local files (PDF, DOCX, DOC, ODT, RTF, XLSX, XLS, HTML) up to 50 MB and get back clean, LLM-ready Markdown, JSON, or a summary. Tables and reading order are preserved, with full Zero Data Retention support for enterprise plans. Available in JS, Python, Go, Rust, Java, .NET, PHP, Ruby, and Elixir SDKs. …View on GitHub ↗ -
Release notes excerpt
Firecrawl v2.9.0 Improvements - Browser Interaction via /interact endpoint — Scrape a page, then call /interact to take actions on it — click buttons, fill forms, navigate deeper, or extract dynamic content. Describe what you want in natural language via prompt, or write Playwright code (Node.js, Python) and Bash (agent-browser) for full control. Sessions persist across calls, with live view and interactive live view URLs for real-time browser streaming. Persistent profiles let you save and reuse browser state (cookies, localStorage) across scrapes. Available in JS, Python, …View on GitHub ↗