RLCD (Reinforcement Learning for Calibrated Decisions)
Also called: Reinforcement Learning for Calibrated Decisions
RLCD is the name TypeSafe AI gives to the reinforcement-learning method it used to train Jev so that the probabilities the model outputs are honest about how often it is right.
Most reinforcement learning for language models rewards a good outcome: a response a person prefers (RLHF), or an answer a program can check (rlvr). Neither directly teaches a model to say how sure it is. RLCD, as TypeSafe describes it, optimizes for "epistemically honest probabilities" on decision tasks, so that when Jev reports 80% it should be right about 80% of the time (see calibrated-confidence).
That matters for Jev because its answers arrive as probabilities that software acts on. A threshold like "act automatically above 0.9" is only meaningful if 0.9 really means about nine times in ten.
RLCD is TypeSafe's own name. In the launch material we reviewed, the detailed reward design and training data are not described, so anything beyond the stated goal is not public knowledge.
How it differs
RLCD vs. rlvr: RLVR rewards a correct final answer that a program can verify. RLCD, per TypeSafe, rewards the quality of the stated probability, so a confident wrong answer is penalized more than a hesitant one. They optimize different things and could in principle be combined.
Common misconceptions
FAQ
What does RLCD stand for?
How is RLCD different from RLHF?
Is RLCD an industry standard?
Part of the Jev topic guide — read the full explainer →
Last checked: 2026-09-21